Archive for April, 2009

Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2009: Prevent Mandatory Nursing Home Arbitration

Friday, April 24th, 2009

I have another nursing home neglect case in which a nursing home (this time Magnolia Place of Greenville) has required a potential resident to waive her right to a jury trial in order to be admitted.  The nursing home industry has been hit hard by lawsuits for negligence that result in serious injury to their elderly residents.  So, instead of improving care, the industry has instead attempted to force residents to give up their right to a jury trial.  The problem is that there are a limited number of nursing home beds in our state.  The number of beds available to poor South Carolinians are even more limited.  So, families, who are without meaningful choices to begin with, are forced to choose between skilled nursing care and their constitutional rights.

Hopefully, the Congress will come to the aid of the elderly and their families.  The Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2009 is currently pending in both chambers of Congress.  The bills would prohibit nursing homes from requiring residents to agree to pre-dispute binding arbitration clauses.  The present state of care in nursing homes is already something you wouldn’t wish on your love one if you had a choice, and allowing nursing homes to prevent judges and juries from holding them responsible when they cause death or serious injury to their residents is simply bad public policy.

  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print

The Right to Work

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

The case of Carolina Chemical Equipment Company v. Daniel B. Muckenfuss 322 S.C. 289, 471 S.E.2d 721 (S.C. 1996) contains one of the clearest expressions (albeit borrowed) of a basic right to work:

[T]he right of an individual to follow and pursue the particular occupation for which he is best trained is a most fundamental right. Our society is extremely mobile and our free economy is based competition. One who has worked in a particular field cannot be compelled to erase from his mind all of the general skills, knowledge and expertise acquired through his experience. These skills are valuable to such employee in the market place for his services. Restraints cannot be lightly placed upon his right to compete in the area of his greatest worth.

Now this is a recognition of an authentic “right to work.”   So, despite the fact that an employee does not own his job, he owns his body and mind, his labor, his knowledge, and his experience.  Right?  Well, sort of.  For more discussion of protecting the right to work as well as the Muckenfuss case visit my other blog:  Beat Your Non-Compete.

  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print

Twitter-at-Law: Connected Lawyers Know More

Friday, April 10th, 2009

twitter-logo-23If you are not a lawyer on Twitter, you probably don’t know @RussRunkel, @elinfonet, @ Eric_B_Meyer or @taxgirl (my personal favorite).  And if  you don’t know these four, there are many others you don’t know.  And what else don’t you NOT know?  These four and about 20 other lawyers whom I follow on Twitter are connecting me to articles about the law, cases about issues important to my practice area, and blogs about the practice of law (blawgs).

Also, Twitter has a search capability that allows you to do use a search engine to search all the “tweets” on a particular topic.  So, if I want to know what is being said about “noncompetes” or the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), I can search those terms and find people and ideas that will be helpful to me.

Of course, there is always the risk of information overload.  Twitter can consume your time and attention.  But for me, I have found that the reward has been well worth it.  I am connected to interesting and smart people who are connecting me to ideas and information.  I am a better-informed lawyer, and my clients are better represented. Does your lawyer use Twitter?

  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print

Severance Agreements and Release of Claims

Monday, April 6th, 2009

I meet with people weekly to review severance agreements.  Almost all severance agreements include a release of claims.  A release of claims is an agreement whereby the one person agrees not to assert claims or file lawsuits against the other. It is logical to wonder if an employer is willing to pay something for a release of claims, whether your claims might actually be worth more money.  And it is possible that requiring an employee to sign a release of claims to collect severance might be a violation of federal law.  So, what do you do?

First, it is not a bad idea to consult an experienced employment lawyer. Of course, there is a cost.  I charge $265 for a one hour consult, but will try to review the agreement ahead of time if it is scanned or faxed.  It is hard to let go of the cash having just lost a job, but saving money can end up costing money.

So, what does someone get for $265?  The short answer is an hour of my time.  During the one hour consultation, I review the agreement and explain its terms.  I also review the facts of the client’s discharge to determine if the termination is discriminatory or wrongful under the law.  If the client has employment law questions, I answer them.  And then I advise the client of any alternatives that might be available to severance, whether that being negotiation or litigation.

Severance which involves a release of claims is essentially an offer to purchase an employee’s right to sue.  If someone is selling a car, she needs to know the Blue Book value of the car to decide if she is getting a good deal.  If someone is settling legal claims, then she needs to know her legal rights to determine if the settlement amount is fair.  Usually, this requires an experienced employment law litigator.

Can a discharged employee make a counteroffer?  Sure.  But, it can be difficult to negotiate more severance, especially without the leverage of a valid legal claim.  Companies need a good reason to pay an employee more money, and sympathy usually doesn’t work.  And even with the assistance of a lawyer, without a legitimate legal basis to bring a lawsuit, there is very little incentive for a company to pay more severance.

However, even though an employer might not be willing to pay additional severance, some will agree not to contest a claim for unemployment benefits.  If an employee has been fired and has no legal recourse, there is value in being permitted to resign.  Most of the time, it is more important to think about getting the next job instead of trying to hang onto the last one.  In some cases, an employer will agree to let an employee resign and still not contest a claim for unemployment benefits.

More and more, the severance includes a re-affirmation of a non-compete agreement’s obligations.  If an employee has a non-compete, then it is even more important to seek legal advice.  Non-competes add to the pain of termination, and sometimes severance negotiations can provide an opportunity to negotiate a shorter non-compete.

Finally, whatever the severance agreement, employees need to make sure all the promises are in writing.  Some make the mistake of relying on an oral promise.  If it is important to the deal, it needs to be in writing.

  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print